RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00330
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His NGB Form 66, Extension of Enlistment in the Air National
Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, reflect a 90-day
extension rather than a 60-day extension.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The NGB Form 66 should reflect a 90-day extension as a 60-day
extension was not authorized.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard in
the grade of technical sergeant.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force at Exhibit B.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends the 60-day extension be replaced with a six
month or 180-day extension. A1PP states they support the
applicants claim insofar as his 60-day extension was not
authorized. .
ANGI 36-2002, Table 4.2 titled, Terms of Extension to
Enlistment, identifies extension requirements for service
members. Rules two and three outline the requirements for said
extensions. Note two states, Member may extend ANG enlistment
for a period of at least 6 months to coincide with the MSO.
Note three expands this requirement by noting, No extensions
may be executed for a period of less than 6 months.
The records need to be corrected to meet the requirements
outlined in ANGI 36-2002. This will result in the applicant
extending for a minimum of six months. NGB/A1PP contacted the
applicants unit and was informed they will extend his
enlistment for six months and remove his 60-day extension as it
was erroneous.
The complete NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 15 September 2014, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit
C). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application is timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this
respect, the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)
has indicated the applicants records should be corrected to
meet the requirements outlined in the ANGI 36-2002 which will
result in his enlistment executed on 24 January 2002 be extended
for a minimum of six months. We note the applicant has
concurred with the recommended relief. Therefore, we are in
agreement with the OPRs recommendation and recommend the
applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he
executed an extension of his 24 January 2002 enlistment for a
period of six (6) months rather than two (2) months.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-00330 in Executive Session on 8 January 2015,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 January 2014, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 14 May 2014.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02601
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, Table 1.5, if an applicant is non-prior service (NPS), the term of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01220
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Air National Guard Instruction (ANGI) 36-2502, Promotion of Airmen, Table 2.1, Rule 2, states that an E-2 should promote to E-3 after six months of Time in Grade (TIG) in the ANG. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not receive a promotion recommendation until 6 Oct 13. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01234
Grade Determination for Non-Prior Service (NPS) Enlistees, enlistment in the grade of E-3 is authorized when the applicant meets the following criteria: a. Presents General Billy Mitchell Award certificate showing successful completion of the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) training program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00655
By letter dated 28 Jan 13, the applicants commander states that due to an administrative oversight the applicant signed a three year reenlistment contract; however, he should have been given the opportunity extend his enlistment for six years. Until such time as he has exhausted all available administrative remedies, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief requested. Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Mar 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 6H reflected on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. The recommended separation was determined to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged with an entry level separation....
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01312
In support of her request, the applicant provides a counsels brief, copies of the paralegal interview, a request for reconsideration into the paralegal career field, paralegal accession disapproval, and letters of recommendation. Her legal counsel stated that four years is sufficient time to recoup its training investment in the Air Force; however, non-prior service ANG members are required to enlist for six years, not four, in accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00027
On 20 Nov 13, the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-3. As such, he was never eligible for promotion to the grade of E-3, effective 21 Jun 13, as requested. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP additional evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He argues a change to the FY13, R&R Initiatives added his AFSC 2T2X1 to the critical skills AFSC list, effective 1 Oct 12, as verified through his Force Support Squadron (FSS).
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01614
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6U (Not selected for reentry by the commander) on his National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be upgraded so he may reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00824
According to Special Order (SO) A-7, dated 6 Oct 06, on 15 Oct 06, The Adjutant General (TAG) of Pennsylvania Air National Guard (PA ANG), demoted the applicant to the grade of MSgt for failure to fulfill his Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) responsibilities. According to a memorandum, dated 10 Oct 13, from TAG, the denied the applicants appeal, dated 21 Aug 13, and determined that his appeal was untimely based on his submission 6 years after the events occurred. Further, while we note...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00029 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C) be changed from 20 Nov 13 to 20 Jun 13. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...